By Don Flynn

Don Flynn argues that mainstream politicians went into this election with significant constraints on their scope to argue for restrictive immigration policies. As the general election results show, voters are prepared to punish politicians who ignore the dimension of social justice when it comes to this issue.

Read full story here

An opinion poll just ahead of a May 6 election shows immigration issue is more vital for the voters than crime, health, or even education, says Reuters.

So far, studies and research have established beyond doubt the importance of migrants in not only making Britain multicultural, but also economically stronger.

In fact, it is now evident that migration has not only enhanced economic growth, but has general benefits as well. Any attempts to halt or reverse it could be economically damaging.

Otherwise also the opinion on Britain benefiting from multiculturalism is gaining credence. Only recently, former Downing Street adviser Andrew Neather claimed mass migration was encouraged by Labour ministers over the past decade to make the UK truly multicultural, and plug in the gaps in the labour market. He asserted the policy has made London a more attractive and diverse place.

Read more

With this, the Conservative leader has made it clear that the party wants to steer clear of Labour’s open-door policy.

If the Tories are allowed to have their way, the move will cut down the net arrival of newcomers to under 40,000 a year, which is a fifth of the current level.

The policy is being delineated in the 130-page Tory manifesto “An Invitation to Government”.

As the party is insisting its leadership is taking into consideration the deep concern about flood of immigrants under Labour, the Tories may soon find themselves in line of fire for playing the race card in the election campaign.

Read more

What BA (Nigeria) did decide is where there would already be a right of appeal, where it is asserted that the decision will breach human rights the right of appeal is an in-country one rather than an out-of-country one. In that case, there was a right of appeal because the decision was a decision to revoke a deportation order, which is listed at s.82(2)(k).

In most cases, there will still be no immigration decision. Take the example of a person has been living in the UK without status for some years, perhaps because the Home Office took no action to remove them after overstaying or making an unsuccessful asylum claim, and who then comes to the attention of UKBA, typically by making a human rights claim themselves or through a traffic incident or other police encounter. The person has formed a durable relationship and has children: he or she has a potentially good human rights claim. The normal course of events is for the Home Office to reject the claim out of hand (‘Kiddies? So what? They’re adaptable little buggers!’) but for the case to get serious consideration on appeal.

Read more

In a speech delivered in Shoreditch, East London, Brown said in his opinion the responsible way to debate migration was to discuss how they could use the system over the coming years to continue to control migration fairly, to reduce the overall need for migration, while continuing to attract the key people who will make the biggest contribution to the growth of our economy.

The assertion is significant as the demand for a debate on immigration isbecoming louder and louder, with the general elections just round the corner.

Brown also explained how the government was transforming the way it dealt with immigration through its controlled and fair points-based system. He said the system they had introduced gave them the ability to secure the skills they needed and to secure the borders against those not welcome here.

Brown asserted the asylum claims were back to the levels of the early 1990s. The recent provisional figures suggested net inward migration too had fallen from 170,000 in 2007 to 147,000 in 2009.

Each fact-sheet challenges one big myth surrounding migration, which is often repeated in public debate, with links to research:

Myth 1: Countries like the UK support a disproportionate number of migrants

Read more

Applications for fresh claims have since been made in some cases and they have really taken long to be decided. A few fortunate applicants have had positive decisions made pursuant to fresh claims and some have had their applications refused.

Many applicants still awaiting decisions in their fresh claims could be familiar with letters from the UK Border Agency to the effect that:

Read more

The Highly Trusted sponsor licence is a new category designed to reward education providers who sponsor under Tier 4 with a proven track record of recruiting genuine students who comply with the UK’s immigration rules.

Highly Trusted sponsors are expected to meet the published criteria in full throughout the period they hold their licence. In return they will be given a number of additional freedoms and benefits for the duration of their registration, and will be offered new services.

From today, you will need to have a sponsor who has Highly Trusted sponsor status in order to apply for the following restricted course levels below degree level:

Read more

Marginal changes have been applied to most visa application fees; more notable changes concern:

Read more

In 2007, when Individual Return Plan started efforts were made to assist every individual according to need. But International Organization for Migration (IOM) now focuses on the needs of families and children

A press release by IOM UK said they were conscious that the needs of families and children require a special focus.

A press release said the Reintegration Assistance package relevant to a single man returning to set up a business will be very different from one of real, practical use to a single parent with three children.

Read more